Supreme Court to Hear New Case on Race and School Admissions
Advertisement
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
The court’s decision to review an admissions policy for selective middle school programs in Maryland follows its rejection of affirmative action in higher education.

The Supreme Court announced on Monday that it would revisit the issue of race and school admissions, three years after it sharply restricted affirmative action in higher education.
The case involves four selective public middle schools in Montgomery County, Md., just outside the nation’s capital. A group of mostly Asian American parents sued the school system after it changed its admissions criteria, saying that the new rules unconstitutionally discriminated against Asian American students.
In 2023, the Supreme Court struck down race-conscious admissions programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina. The justices did not address other school policies intended to diversify student bodies that do not explicitly address race.
Since then the court has declined to hear several other challenges to admissions criteria at elite public schools, including one from Virginia and another from the military academy at West Point.
It takes the votes of four justices to grant review, however, and several justices had previously signaled their interest in continuing to explore the implications of the court’s decision affecting higher education. In the Virginia case, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. dissented, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, saying the court should have taken the case.
The justices also agreed on Monday to hear a challenge to federal bans on home distillation of whiskey and other spirits. An Ohio engineer had brought a lawsuit against a nearly 160-year-old federal ban on home distilling, in a case that will test 1860s-era prohibitions. The two cases will be added to the justices’ calendar for oral argument next year and decided before the Supreme Court’s term ends in late June or early July.
Related Content
Advertisement
Comments 0
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
US Politics
Explore All
Vance ‘privately’ blasts Netanyahu as Iran war divides Trump admin, 2028 ambitions loom
JD Vance privately accused Benjamin Netanyahu of being "wrong on everything" about the Iran war as he positions himself for a 2028 president...
Child molester's looming prison release reignites sanctuary showdown in wake of Dem election sweep
7 hours ago
Trump signs proclamation to prevent changes to Oval Office, other White House rooms
7 hours ago
Trump signs proclamation preventing changes to Oval Office, other White House rooms
7 hours agoEx-Biden official projected to win bid to unseat Mike Lawler in high-stakes House race
7 hours agoWhats New
View All
Why one Republican won a redrawn Texas district despite blue tsunami
Iraq’s al-Zaidi talks to Trump as Baghdad seeks to stay out of war on Iran
Trump issues proclamation declaring Oval Office national monument
Jane Fonda ‘Didn’t Dare Imagine’ Democrats’ Blue Tsunami: ‘We Have to Block What’s Bad and Fight For What’s Good’
Israeli settlers seize 8 Palestinian homes in Jericho, displacing dozens
Pamela Abdy on Life After Warner Bros: ‘Right Now, I’m Taking a Break and Chilling’
Taiwan Creative Content Fest Opens as Chair Sue Wang Says ‘Culture Is Power’ Amid AI Shift
Trump's massive Arlington triumphal arch approved for construction by federal planning commission
‘Lord of the Rings,’ ‘Avatar’ VFX House Weta FX to Invest in Taiwan’s Moonshine Studio Under AI Pact With TAICCA