Justice Dept. Brings More Charges Against Comey, Accusing Him of Leaks
Advertisement
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
Lawyers for James B. Comey said the case centered on an issue that had already been investigated and had not led to charges, of a purported leak of national security information to The Times in October 2016.

Federal prosecutors have brought new charges against James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director, accusing him of mishandling national security information in October 2016 that they said ended up in a New York Times article, according to court papers unsealed on Monday.
The case highlights the extraordinary effort the Justice Department has expended in pursuing Mr. Comey, a vocal critic of President Trump’s who has emerged as one of his most favored targets. It is the third time in 13 months that the Trump administration has sought to prosecute Mr. Comey, whom Mr. Trump fired as F.B.I. director in 2017.
The new charges came in the form of a criminal information filed under seal in Federal District Court in Washington this month, the court records say, meaning that prosecutors brought charges without immediately seeking approval from either a judge or a grand jury. Mr. Comey’s lawyers had in recent weeks sought to get the charges dismissed, but have yet to succeed, the records show.
In a video posted online, Mr. Comey vowed to fight the case.
“I’m still innocent. I’m still not afraid of these people,” he said. The new case against him, he said, “would almost be funny if it weren’t such an appalling abuse of the Department of Justice, one that we cannot become numb to.”
The charging document was signed by two senior officials at Justice Department headquarters, as well as lower-ranking line prosecutors on special assignments from other offices, including the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. attorney offices in Texas and Florida.
Mr. Comey is accused of knowingly and willfully causing national defense information to be “communicated, delivered and transmitted to a person not entitled to receive it” around Oct. 4 and 5 of 2016. Court papers in the case point to an Oct. 5 article in The Times describing a novel use of surveillance authority involving Yahoo emails.
Related Content
Advertisement
Comments 0
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
US Politics
Explore All
America saw the blue wave coming — but drastically underestimated the extent of the Dem tsunami
James Talarico toppled Ken Paxton, and Gina Hinojosa unseated Greg Abbott as Texas delivered historic Democratic upsets in the 2026 midterms.
Bonta says he'll counter DOJ election monitors with observers of his own
3 hours ago
Trump pledges to veto 'insane' Dem bills, pinpoints issue partially to blame for Republican losses
3 hours ago
‘LAWYER UP’: Democrats, Republicans waste no time in setting social media ablaze after midterm sweep
3 hours agoEl-Sayed mocks Trump, Vance and Rogers in gloating victory speech signaling combative tone in Senate
4 hours agoWhats New
View All
Canva lays off over 1,200 people amid slowing growth
‘Call me senator’: How Abdul El-Sayed beat Trump’s hate to create history
I Tried Amazon’s New Kindles. Buy This Accessory Instead (2026)
‘Seismic shift’: World reacts to US midterm election results
Can Russia compete with the US, China and the EU in Africa?
The Zelda: Ocarina Of Time Remake Shows That A Masterpiece Is Ageless
Best Wireless Earbuds I’d Buy Right Now (2026): Apple, Beats, Bose, and More
Jessica Rothe SXSW Sci-Fi Thriller ‘Imposters’ Sells to Brainstorm Media for U.S., Racks Up International Deals Ahead of AFM (EXCLUSIVE)
‘I will not delete my posts’: Inside Uganda’s crackdown on online critics